Free videos

  • A Romp through Ethics for Complete Beginners - iTunes VideoWeb Video - Marianne Talbot, Oxford University
  • Aesthetics & Philosophy of Art – iTunesWeb – James Grant, Oxford University
  • Ancient and Medieval Philosophy - iTunes Video - Web Video – David O’Connor, Notre Dame
  • Ancient PhilosophyiTunes – David Ebrey, UC Berkeley
  • Ancient Wisdom and Modern Love - iTunes Video - Web Video – Professor David O’Connor, Notre Dame
  • Aristotle: EthicsWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Aristotle: RhetoricWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Authority & the Individual: Six BBC Lectures - Web Site – Bertrand Russell, Cambridge
  • Critical Reasoning for Beginners - iTunes VideoiTunes AudioWeb Video & Audio - Marianne Talbot, Oxford
  • DeathYouTubeiTunes AudioiTunes VideoDownload Course – Shelly Kagan, Yale
  • Environmental PhilosophyiTunes Video - Web Video – Kenneth Sayre, Notre Dame
  • Existentialism in Literature & FilmiTunes – Hubert Dreyfus, UC Berkeley
  • General PhilosophyiTunesWeb – Peter Millican, Oxford University
  • Hegel: The Philosophy of HistoryWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Heidegger: Being and Time - Sean Dorrance Kelly – Harvard - RSS FeedWeb Site
  • Heidegger’s Being & TimeiTunes - Hubert Dreyfus, UC Berkeley
  • Heideggers Being and Time, Division IIiTunes - Hubert Dreyfus, UC Berkeley
  • Hobbes: Leviathan and De Cive (1964) - Web Site - Leo Strauss, U Chicago.
  • Introduction to Political PhilosophyYouTubeiTunesDownload Course, Steven B. Smith, Yale
  • Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do? – YouTube - Web Site- Michael Sandel, Harvard
  • KantWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Kant’s Critique of Pure ReasoniTunes VideoiTunes Audio- Video/Audio on Web – Dan Robinson, Oxford
  • Later HeideggerWeb Site – Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard
  • Walter Kaufmann Lectures on Nietzsche, Kierkegaard and Sartre - Web Site
  • Kant’s EpistemologyiTunes – Dr Susan Stuarts, University of Glasgow
  • Man, God, and Society in Western Literature - iTunes Audio – Hubert Dreyfus, UC Berkeley
  • Medical EthicsWeb Audio – David Solomon, Notre Dame
  • Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws (1966) - Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Morality and Modernity - Web Video – David Solomon, Notre Dame
  • Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil - Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Philosophy in Film and Other Media - iTunesYouTube – Irving Singer, MIT
  • Philosophy for BeginnersiTunesVideo/Audio on the Web – Marianne Talbot, Oxford
  • Philosophy of LanguageiTunes – John Searle, UC Berkeley
  • Philosophy of Love in the Western WorldiTunesYouTube – Irving Singer, MIT
  • Philosophy of Mind - iTunes – John Searle, UC Berkeley
  • Philosophy of SocietyiTunes – John Searle, UC Berkeley
  • Plato Apology/Crito - Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Plato: GorgiasWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago.
  • Plato: LawsWeb Site - Leo Strauss, U Chicago.
  • Plato: Meno - Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Plato, Protagoras -Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Plato’s RepublicWeb Site – Laurence Bloom, University of Georgia
  • Proust & PhilosophyFeed – Johns Hopkins
  • The Art of Living - Web Site – Team taught, Stanford
  • The Examined LifeiTunes – Greg Reihman, Lehigh University
  • The History of Philosophy Without Any Gaps - Multiple Formats– Peter Adamson, King’s College London
  • The Moral Foundations of Politics - iTunes Video - iTunes Audio- YouTube - Web Site – Professor Ian Shapiro, Yale
  • The Nature of MindiTunes – John Joseph Campbell, UC Berkeley
  • The Secular and The SacredWeb Site – Sean Dorrance Kelly, Harvard
  • Theory of MeaningiTunes AudioiTunes Video – John Joseph Campbell
  • ThucydidesWeb Site - Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Truth & Subjectivity/The Culture Of The SelfWeb Site – Michel Foucault, UC Berkeley
  • Vico: Seminar in Political PhilosophyWeb Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago
  • Xenophon’s Oeconomicus - Web Site – Leo Strauss, U Chicago

Sufis and the Enneagram

Always be ready to give an explanation to anyone who asks you for a reason for your hope, but do it with gentleness and reverence, keeping your conscience clear, so that, when you are maligned, those who defame your good conduct in Christ may themselves be put to shame. -- 1 Peter 3:15-16

It is quite common for one religion to assimilate things from another religion. It has been done often in the history of Christianity; for instance, our word "Easter" has pagan origins. Taking things from other religions and Christianizing them is useful and healthy, adding variety.

It also happens that other religions take elements of Catholicism and adapt them to another religion. Voodoo did that: mixing Catholicism with African superstitions, but it is a harmless example because people do not consider it to be Catholic since it was never made to appear Catholic. But there are times when Christian elements are assimilated into another religion and there is an effort to deceive and trick good people into their religion.

New Age does this. The attendant spirit of a witch is traditionally depicted as a black cat and called a "familiar", which is unacceptable to Christians, but instead of a black cat, picture the familiar as a person with wings and long robes, and instead of calling it a "familiar" call it an "angel", and now Catholics can be tricked into accepting it. Or if a crystal pyramid is used to gain magical powers, no good Catholic would listen to such a foolish notion; substitute a container of Lourdes water for the crystal, and suddenly you've gotten the Catholics' attention. Good Catholics are attracted by talk about angels and Lourdes, or about creation and prayer, and often take it for granted that whenever people talk about such things, they mean what people normally mean. Actually they were assimilated into the New Age religious system and given new definitions. That's how formerly good Catholics, even priests, can be tricked into accepting another religion, sometimes without ever even realizing it.


The Enneagram was developed from the Sufi religion, though it was not made up by the Sufis. It was introduced to the West by a Russian, George Ivanovich Gurdjieff, who sought to use it to foretell the future. It later gained acceptance among some Catholics. The Enneagram as we have it now was invented in Chile.

Many Sufis are very similar to witches. They believe they have the power to cast spells (they call it projecting "baraka"), to travel through time into the past and future, to heal, to read minds, to communicate telepathically with each other, and they have a superstitious belief in supernatural powers of certain things (certain kinds of candy and flowers). Clairvoyance and ESP to them are simply normal parts of life.

These Sufis believe in using their powers for the sake of the Design. This "design" is God's plan for mankind: the direction God wishes human evolution to take. Only the Sufi masters are privy to this secret design; the Sufis are Gnostics in the sense that they believe in esoteric knowledge (but they do not believe in a good god vs. an evil god). They believe they must safeguard this hidden design or pattern; whenever human beings anywhere in the world do something which harms the design, they must use their supernatural powers to put things right. (There is also a vague connection between the Sufis and Freemasonry, because of the similarity of symbolism used by a 9th century Sufi, Dhul Nun, who was associated with the Order of the Bannayin (Builders), and modern Masonic symbolism.)


The Sufis believe the "design" ("naqsh") is hidden underneath appearances, which are false: reality lies beneath appearances. They must see through outward appearances to find the truth, the reality, under them, where the design can be found. This especially includes looking beneath their own appearances. They must come to know their "real selves" and only then they can know "Reality". To know Reality, and then act on it, is the ultimate goal of the Sufi religion.

The Enneagram is a system of assigning a number from 1 to 9 to oneself and every human being. This number is said to reveal the hidden motivation for everything a person does. Intelligence is given three "centers": thought, emotion, and instinct. Mainly because of the environment, the three centers are always imbalanced. The result of this imbalance is that a person's "true self" is always hidden beneath a "false self". The Enneagram is supposed to enable a person to gain knowledge of his true self, exposing the true motivations for actions and illusions developed regarding himself and regarding how to deal with the world.

Discovering one's "true self" and the real motives for everything one does, concealed as the Sufis believe they are beneath false appearances, is vital to the Sufi religion; it is not part of Christianity. On the other hand, goodness and holiness, to know, love, and serve God on Earth and be happy with Him forever in Heaven, are the proper goals of the Christian, and these are not goals for the Sufi. If evil must be done for the sake of the design, that is not a problem for them. They believe the ends always justifies the means: it makes no difference at all whether human evolution is set right through good or through evil actions on the part of the Sufi.


In promoting the Enneagram, an effort is made to take Sufi objectives, their kind of self- knowledge and knowledge of others, for the sake of promoting Christian objectives. But it's the opposite that happens: Christian goals are used for the sake of promoting the aims of the Sufi religion: the Catholic religion is assimilated into the Enneagram and the Sufi religion.

Catholics using the Enneagram talk about things like saints and sin and faith and "fruits of the spirit". Using these words makes it sound legitimate. But they are only adapting these terms to the Enneagram, by giving them different definitions.

The word "saint" is used in the Sufi religion, but can have an entirely different meaning. It has nothing whatever to do with holiness. A Sufi "saint" ("wali") is a person who is illuminated to Reality. This is the word used in the Enneagram (even by Catholics): a "saint" is a person who overcomes his false self and knows and acts according to his true self.

The word "sin" is used a lot, but with a new definition. Sin is not a deliberate transgression of God's law. The word is redefined into personality traits that separate people from God or their real selves. Sin is the sinister motivation everybody has for everything they do, a part of human personality. It must be accepted and brought under control. The number assigned to a person by the Enneagram indicates what their one "root sin" is and will always be. "Sin" is also called "addiction".

"Original Sin" has nothing to do with Adam and Eve. Their "Original Sin" is a psychological condition, meaning that a person is never at any time in his life undamaged or free, but is always exposed to harmful forces. It describes the conditions in the environment which cause the imbalance among the three intelligence centers.

Another term used in the Enneagram is "fruits of the spirit". These have nothing to do with the Holy Spirit. In the Enneagram, the fruits of the spirit are good inclinations a person gets according to his number in the Enneagram. The "Holy Spirit" according to the Enneagram is not a Person at all: He is a synonym for "power" or "energy" in Enneagram spirituality (unlike the Father and Son, who are recognized as real persons).

"Prayer" is talked about as part of the Enneagram, but their definition of prayer has nothing to do with God: prayer is absorbing elements from the environment into oneself, or projecting oneself into the environment, or delving into Nothingness. "Redemption" in the Enneagram has nothing whatever to do with Christ. It is the same as maturity, which is what they call freedom from one's "false self" to one's "true self". This true self is also called the "soul", another redefined word. Even "Heaven" is given a new definition: it is only a symbol for the perfection of freedom from one's false self to one's true self.

Two other terms which are given new definitions according to the Enneagram are "faith" and "obedience". According to their definitions, a person cannot have true faith unless he has doubts. A person cannot be truly obedient unless he refuses if he disagrees; in fact, in the very act of defiance, a person is being truly obedient according to the Enneagram's definition of obedience.

Taking words from our religion and changing their meanings can give things, even an entire different religion, the outward appearance of being Catholic. Some people are satisfied that something is good just because they hear a Christian vocabulary being used. That makes the slip into apostasy very gentle and painless.

R. Kephart 1994

Here are some controversial opinions.


Here are the flaws concerning the Enneagram according to Robert Todd Carroll, author of the "Skeptic's Dictionary."


Taken from "The New Age: A Christian Critique" by Ralph Rath, the Eenneagram encourage Christians to bend their standards to deal with their problems.

The Enneagram and the MBTI

Is there a relationship between the nine Enneagram and sixteen MBTI types? What principles underlie both belief systems.

Tell Me Who I Am, O Enneagram

This article published in the "Christian Research Institute Journal" takes the position that God does not have nine faces.

What's The Enneagram?

Kevin McCarthy answers a question from a Catholic viewer saying the Enneagram is an evil device.

More..... and more... and a series of articles